Thiel’s 20-20 Vision: Stop Out of College

The average cost of a college education at a private institution is just short of $37,000 per year, according to an

NPR survey last October. One important question students ask themselves when entering is, “What will I get out of this?” It’s a question I’m asking myself right now, and although I’m still uncertain as to its answer, I am confident in answering that question’s converse: “What will I put into my college experience?”

The answer I give is the one given by many of my colleagues. No matter how awesome an idea I might devise, how elegant a solution I may find to some problem big or small, the amount of time necessary to bring these plans to fruition is too large to balance with school. And this is really unfortunate, because in a business environment developing faster than, well, any previous business environment since the 1990s, any good idea I or one of my friends may have today will be brought to market by some other guy or his friends two months from now.

I’m not the only one to giggle at my college’s attempt to spur “socially-conscious innovation”, the de rigueur form of entrepreneurship amongst affluent American youth, through new venture competitions. The $10,000 that the University of Chicago, like other institutions’ incentives of similar size, is offering to “the most innovative idea” is not enough to get my “social venture” off the ground, or, for that matter, to make me stop out of college to launch it. It seems as though universities have “missed the boat”, as it were, in reaching out to the most innovative students.

Peter Thiel, PayPal co-founder, billionaire venture capitalist, hedge fund manager, and early Facebook investor, does not play around when it comes to inspiring young people to build their ideas into companies. His eponymous Thiel Fellowship promises twenty entrepreneurs under twenty years old cash grants of up to $100,000 to do so.

Importantly, Thiel’s fellowship program touches on two key points: young people seeking to develop innovative technology- and breakthrough scientific companies might best spend a few years under the aegis of top-notch mentors instead of in college, where interaction with professors is, at best, undertaken in fifteen-minute fits and starts during “office hours”. Secondly, the Fellowship turns conventional wisdom on its head. A “college education” does not necessarily make a young person employable. During the fellowship, not only will fellows receive mentorship, employment opportunities, support, and training, they will—gasp—be paid for their efforts.

This lays bare the somewhat ridiculous logic behind the you-must-have-a-BA-to-apply school of employability determination. Nothing about sitting on my butt, furiously taking lecture notes, half-assing my way through papers (on which I still, regrettably, receive A’s), skipping a good 70% of the assigned reading, and making the dean’s list means I’m a valuable hire. This is why so many young people eschew the many demands of school: our goal is to be innovators, entrepreneurs; spending time proving our suitability for work in some cubicle farm or in front of a Bloomberg terminal is anathema to our goals. We, the over-twenty student population, are busy educating ourselves for the work we want to do. It’s unfortunate that we must do so in spite of our schooling. Thiel hit on something with his Fellowship; it gives recipients credentials, the “signaling value” of a college degree, without the cheery notions of “getting an education” that colleges shove down students’ throats.

Whether Fellowship recipients continue on with entrepreneurship or go into the corporate world, one thing is clear: their resumes have a tangibility to them that college grads’ do not… that is, unless the college grad spent his or her time starting companies and “getting things done” instead of simply “doing school”, no matter how well they did. I’d hire a Thiel Fellow, his or her Harvard B.A.’ed competition be damned.

Over the coming weeks, Flyover Geeks will be highlighting young entrepreneurs. If you know any young entrepreneurs in the science, technology, or other fields under the age of 25 who you think FG should profile, let us know in the comments section.

Jason Rowley: Jason D. Rowley does not like being wrong. He is a writer, startup founder, sometimes landscaper and gardner, and his library’s best customer. Jason is heavily involved with the entrepreneurship scene at the University of Chicago, where he studied political science before “taking a break” (e.g. dropping out, noncommittally) to work with his classmates on his current project, which will debut shortly. He’s written voluminous, ripsnorting articles for Flyover Geeks (now Tech.li) for over six months and publishes on Tuesdays. Edward Domain and others have described him as “obstreperous”, a label he wears with not inconsiderable pride. Jason, in spite of these claims, is a pretty nice guy.

View Comments (4)

  • Good article, but it sounds like you assume school is about training you to make money, not helping you think about what you want out of life. I think it should be about the latter. I completely agree with you about most school's broken entrepreneurial scene (I graduated not having a clue about recent innovations), but it is also important to develop into a socially aware, emotionally intelligent individual if you think you will be the next big thing. I am not saying this can only be done in school, but I think we need to view school as more than a waste of money and time if curricula and admissions will ever improve.

    On top of that, the brain isn't fully cemented together (you aren't emotionally mature) until well after your teenage years. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?stor...

    Either way, enjoy school hile you can!

    • Grad- I like your comment and agree- to a point. College was a fantastic experience for me, but it also left me with debt. Unless someone has parents that can foot the bill, College HAS to be about making money just to pay for the experience.

      And while I got a lot out of college, I have learned more on my own in areas of my life where I had passion and drive. I realize not everyone is built this way, but as an aspiring entrepreneur I feel like Jason hit the nail on the head: College is very good about training people to follow on the footsteps of those that came before them and go work for a company. Entrepreneurs by their nature buck the trend and want to make their own way.

      Now that I have said all that, I still enjoyed college but also think I would be farther along in life to attaining what I want had I NOT gone. I'll also say specialized programs/advanced degrees like a law degree or MBA are worth it if you know what you want to do with it- getting an advanced degree with no goal doesn't seem wise.

      I'll also say that since building and growing Flyover Geeks, some of the most brilliant people I have met are students and/or grads of Kellogg and Booth- based on the caliber of these people I wholeheartedly think those advanced degrees are worth it based on the quality of people and connections that can be made.... but still expensive.

      Overall, great article Jason!

      • Ed- You are right, tuition rates are extremely high, and most Americans cannot afford and won't attend college. Students come out saddled with debt, and are forced to take positions with companies that often entail lifeless cubicles, or very low paying (sometimes unpaid) jobs. Going to college is a privilege, but may also be a risk of its own in the future (can I pay the debt back vs. should I start my own company). This is a structural crisis, really a mirror to everything else that is screwed up.

        I think the present value of colleges and grad schools are the social, creative aspects. Some think that one thing American students had over other countries is the ability to socialize, to play, and to experiment with tastes and patterns (maybe a nifty way to say 'party'). This makes individuals more prone to risk, and to build products that actual change cultures, like facebook and twitter. Socialization stimulates personal and creative skills, and I have a hard time believing Jason would come up with his brilliant idea without getting beat up by U of C professors for a few years or being able to bounce ideas off of like-minded people.

        Either way, this is a discussion that needs to happen more often.

        • best line:

          "...and I have a hard time believing Jason would come up with his brilliant idea without getting beat up by U of C professors for a few years or being able to bounce ideas off of like-minded people. "

          Well said!

          Jason?