Is Having Two Identities a Lack of Integrity?

Thanks a lot for this beauty enjoying article with me. It is so interesting. I really appreciate it.Thank!

Okay, I understand what you're saying. Thanks for the response. Still, people mature a lot in their 20s, right?

Regardless of whether or not Mark has matured since then, I think it's unfair to say Mark = Facebook. Facebook as a company and Mark as a human being are allowed to have separate identities. Within Facebook, each individual can a unique identity, while collectively upholding the values of Facebook as a group. I'm not here to state that they are, merely to point out a seeming flaw in your argument.

Okay, Focus on being constructive, some ideas... 1. Warren Buffet credits his leadership and people skills partially to his Dale Carnegie classes 2. Ross Perot and Sam Wiley were taught communication skills as part of the IBM sales team. Ross Perot was a natural salesperson, so the training probably did not affect him as much. 3. Huey P. Long became a great communicator through selling products door to door. If you are intent on writing a negative article, state what is wrong. Is it the fact that Zuckerberg disrespects his customers? Plenty of politicians and business leaders do the same to their constituents and customers, just not as openly. In other words, they have a better control of their public persona.  So the problem seems to be the manner with which Zuckerberg displayed his views, not so much what he actually said. The manner in which he said dumbf#$ks is something that is dealt with in leadership training or having the experience of understanding people's needs.  Leadership training and etiquette as part of a job are rare. Understanding people's needs and emotions are required in most high-tech jobs today. To leave the reader with positive material would be to mention how to a better communicator, how to establish a better persona, etc.

Andrew, I think you can do much better with this article. It seems like you simply rehashed an old attack to diss Zuckerberg. Okay, you may not like Zuckerberg, but published articles are not the place to display disdain. As a reader, I do not take away anything from this post. Otto: You imply 27 is young, you and I both know this is ludicrous. A generation ago 27 was plenty old, Look at Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, Paul Allen, Fidel Castro, Ross Perot (IBM days), etc. all were under 28 when they had to effectively communicate with the world. I'm sure Bill Clinton and Huey P. Long had no lack of communication skills at age 27 either. It also appears you misconstrued the message. Rich has nothing to do with his responsibility. It is the fact that he assumes the role of a leader (CEO).

He's how old, 27? Just because he's rich doesn't mean he's wise, or worth anything as a human, that we should listen to him or expect anything of him. 

Integrity is not using "private instant message" in public :) But on a serious note: where did this message come from? Anyone can claim it's true, to ruin someonelses good name. If it's true, it's a shitty thing to say from someone who is about to become a CEO of stock listed company :( Bad Zuck.